Discussion: physics/bounds admissibility checks for agentic tool calls #45

Hi MiniMax team — M1's long-horizon agentic focus makes tool-call argument validity a natural eval topic: physical admissibility of generated arguments (probability/confidence in [0,1], non-negative counts, no NaN in numeric arrays, speeds within physical caps).

We maintain a deterministic rule-based checker for this surface — no LLM call, verdicts reproducible given input + a pinned rule-table version and configuration (phm-lite-check). Rules updated during review discussion in microsoft/PyRIT#3507 (public thread); ships as a Dify Marketplace plugin and MCP-registry-listed package.

Ask: would an eval note or script along these lines be useful here? The rule table and per-class checks are in the public repo.

— PHM-Audit