[lorenzocorallo]

Stacked on #114. A local stack for the regulations editor, for the admin thread and the orchestrator's end-to-end test.
See docs/regulations-dev.md.

• docker/regulations-dev.compose.yaml: Postgres 18 and the latex-worker, built FROM legal's TeX Live image
  (TEXLIVE_IMAGE, a locally built :local until legal publishes it). The worker runs with the cluster's
  sandbox: uid 1000, read-only root, tmpfs, cap_drop: ALL, no-new-privileges, 1.5 GiB / 2 CPUs.
• bun run regulations:dev: the dev IdP (4300), backend (3000, --watch) and collab (4100/4101) with one shared
  env.
• scripts/regulations/dev-idp.ts: a development-only stand-in for PoliNetwork Auth. It serves what auth-kit
  reads (JWKS, token endpoint, access snapshot) and the account directory for dev-accounts.json, and mints
  at+jwt access tokens with name and email (CLI and GET /dev/token?sub=). It refuses
  NODE_ENV=production. Pointing a backend at the real IdP needs a dev client registration and the backend
  client's key, which only Lorenzo can provide.
• bun run regulations:seed: through the real API, imports legal.json and the RRI and creates three drafts with
  assignments. A and B change the same comma (a merge conflict). It then waits for the first PDF.

Verified (this machine, against legal's RRI migration branch)

• Seed: rri imported. The merge B → A reports exactly one conflict, on "Articolo 2.2.1 (Descrizione generale),
  comma 2". The first compile of A is ok.
• End to end over HTTP and websocket, with tokens from the shim:
  • me.access and regulations.me.get for an account with only assignments (3 drafts, no permissions).
  • Tickets from regulations.collabTicket for editor, direttivo and commenter, three HocuspocusProviders on
    ws://localhost:4100: the editor's edit reaches the direttivo, and the commenter's edit is rejected.
  • Compile broadcasts queued → running → ok. compile.pdf returns a PDF containing both the live edit and the
    seeded change.
  • drafts.get capabilities for the editor: edit: true, assign: false, no transitions.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

• Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn