Repository navigation
Fix the inverted hasFailed() description and example in the docs - #1872
Merged
alganet merged 1 commit intoOct 2, 2026
Merged
Conversation
alganet
approved these changes
Oct 2, 2026
Member
|
Thanks for the contribution! 🐼 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "Validating arrays of items" example on the handling results page prints nothing as written, even though the second item in its list has a number for a name and a negative price. The
hasFailed()check in the loop has a!it shouldnt. Near the top of the page the description ofhasFailed()is backwards the same way, "trueif validation passed". The two sample lines under it are right, I ran them.Take the
!of and the example prints