Repository navigation
fix(auth): omit scope on refresh unless caller sets one #1433
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
no-hup
wants to merge
4
commits into
modelcontextprotocol:main
Choose a base branch
from
no-hup:fix/oauth-refresh-scope
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e982f62
fix(auth): omit scope on refresh unless caller sets one
no-hup f2df667
fix(auth): keep original grant on narrowed refresh, update refresh docs
no-hup ba03e34
fix(auth): fail refresh when no configured scope is granted, keep ori…
no-hup 8873173
fix(auth): keep an unknown grant unknown after a subset refresh
no-hup File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When imported or legacy credentials have an empty
granted_scopes, an unscoped refresh can legally return an explicitly narrower access-token scope (for example, the refresh token grantsread writebut the response saysscope: read). This remainingoriginal_grant.is_empty() && !asked_for_subsetbranch then persistsreadas the refresh token's full grant, so a laterset_refresh_scopes(["write"])is rejected locally even though that refresh token still permits it; the new subset guard only preserves unknown grants when scopes were explicitly requested, so the unscoped narrowed-response case should remain unknown as well.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.